<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>生信菜鸟团 &#187; peaksview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/tag/peaksview/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bio-info-trainee.com</link>
	<description>欢迎去论坛biotrainee.com留言参与讨论，或者关注同名微信公众号biotrainee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 14:30:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>zh-CN</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.33</generator>
	<item>
		<title>根据比对的bam文件来对peaks区域可视化</title>
		<link>http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/1843.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/1843.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ulwvfje]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CHIP-seq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peaksview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samtools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/?p=1843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[之前分析了好几个公共项目，拿到的peaks都很诡异，搞得我一直怀疑是不是自己分析 &#8230; <a href="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/1843.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>之前分析了好几个公共项目，拿到的peaks都很诡异，搞得我一直怀疑是不是自己分析错了。终于，功夫不负有心人，我分析了一个数据，它的peaks非常完美！！！可以证明，我的分析流程以及peaks绘图代码并没有错！数据来自于<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE74311">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE74311</a>，是关于H3K27ac_ChIP-Seq_LOUCY，组蛋白修饰的CHIP-seq数据，很容易就下载了作者上传的测序数据，然后跑了我的流程！<a href="https://github.com/jmzeng1314/NGS-pipeline/tree/master/CHIPseq">https://github.com/jmzeng1314/NGS-pipeline/tree/master/CHIPseq</a><span id="more-1843"></span></p>
<p>本文的重点在于讲解如何查看自己的peaks是否是正确的！<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>我是直接用比对的bam文件来用samtools depth命令来获取peaks区域的测序深度，从而画图的，代码见</strong></span><a title="step5-peaks-view-samtools-depth.R" href="https://github.com/jmzeng1314/NGS-pipeline/blob/master/CHIPseq/step5-peaks-view-samtools-depth.R">step5-peaks-view-samtools-depth.R</a></p>
<p>在终端调用我的代码画图命令如下；</p>
<blockquote><p>Rscript ~/scripts/peakView.R ../unique_peaks.bed ../../SRR2774675.unique.sorted.bam ../../SRR2774676.unique.sorted.bam<br />
Rscript ~/scripts/peakView.R ../unique_peaks.bed ../../SRR2774675.unique.sorted.bam ../../SRR2774676.unique.sorted.bam</p></blockquote>
<p>下面随便看两个peaks，很明显是双峰模型，而且IP的测序深度远高于INPUT，数据非常棒！</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/MACS_peak_26338.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1844" src="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/MACS_peak_26338.png" alt="MACS_peak_26338" width="480" height="480" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/MACS_peak_26309.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1845" src="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/MACS_peak_26309.png" alt="MACS_peak_26309" width="480" height="480" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>然后我不得不指出如果CHIP-seq实验失败，那么peaks会很诡异，首先你会看到测序深度大多都在10以下，即使有部分测序深度很高的，也是IP和INPUT的测序深度压根就没有差异，下面就是一个典型的失败案例！</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/MACS_peak_525.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1846" src="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/MACS_peak_525.png" alt="MACS_peak_525" width="480" height="480" /></a> <a href="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/MACS_peak_542.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1847" src="http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/MACS_peak_542.png" alt="MACS_peak_542" width="480" height="480" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>这种实验失败的数据，实在是无法分析。而转录因子的CHIP-seq实验失败率还挺高的，所以一定要有control，否则再怎么分析也是<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> rubbish in rubbish out</span></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bio-info-trainee.com/1843.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
